Inconsistent legal theory.

So why are illustrations of children in sexual situations considered the same as child pornography, but illustrations of torture or mass murder not the same as the act?

Why are pictures of children in swimsuits pornography but nude babies on tv aren't?

Why can we farm and kill animals for sport, food, clothing, medicine, etc but we can't have sex with them?

How is copying a picture online the same as making a new picture?